Hello I run a topic for my research can not find answers.
The dicutions on road pollution still turn on emissions, we sometimes end up with a climate almost hate to owners of older vehicles "pollutants" while their owners are some of the pros of eco-driving.
Then what about manufacturing? The most recent are already packed with electronics to manufacture ultra-polluting and non-recyclable. The lifetime is less because the necessary equipment is not within the reach of the individual. Or are manufactured and the vehicles or their materials come from increasingly diverse (are they recyclable?) All these transports are not they pollute more than the savings realized? The steering has become a standard, tire wear is it a big source of pollution? Hence they come? Is it recycles well? A turbocharged doing less rejection but burn more oxygen, thus increasing the CO2 levels in the air. Is it really better?
The questions are still numerous. I am open to any criticism recess.
Measures that seem to me more just:
Reduce the diversity of the car park.
Reducing engine power or at least lengthen the reports.
Make simple vehicles and lengthen their lifespan (parts available long)
One idea would be to create as a hitchhiker cuff available comissariat and recover in the coming days to promote carpooling bypassing Internet and avoid the fear of theft or assault.
Here again your ideas are welcome and if these measures parraissent utopian and impractical, at least let's stop this psychosis around polluting vehicles that divides the population. The question is more complex than the release of CO2 and particulates
Anecdote: fesiez you that there are 15 years in case of failure? Grand gestures, he would sometimes take a while before someone helps you. Now called a friend who sometimes move from far to come help. This is one example among many others that prove nuvels technologies have increased displacements instead of reducing them (see sustainable computing on wikipedia)
Good day to all
The dicutions on road pollution still turn on emissions, we sometimes end up with a climate almost hate to owners of older vehicles "pollutants" while their owners are some of the pros of eco-driving.
Then what about manufacturing? The most recent are already packed with electronics to manufacture ultra-polluting and non-recyclable. The lifetime is less because the necessary equipment is not within the reach of the individual. Or are manufactured and the vehicles or their materials come from increasingly diverse (are they recyclable?) All these transports are not they pollute more than the savings realized? The steering has become a standard, tire wear is it a big source of pollution? Hence they come? Is it recycles well? A turbocharged doing less rejection but burn more oxygen, thus increasing the CO2 levels in the air. Is it really better?
The questions are still numerous. I am open to any criticism recess.
Measures that seem to me more just:
Reduce the diversity of the car park.
Reducing engine power or at least lengthen the reports.
Make simple vehicles and lengthen their lifespan (parts available long)
One idea would be to create as a hitchhiker cuff available comissariat and recover in the coming days to promote carpooling bypassing Internet and avoid the fear of theft or assault.
Here again your ideas are welcome and if these measures parraissent utopian and impractical, at least let's stop this psychosis around polluting vehicles that divides the population. The question is more complex than the release of CO2 and particulates
Anecdote: fesiez you that there are 15 years in case of failure? Grand gestures, he would sometimes take a while before someone helps you. Now called a friend who sometimes move from far to come help. This is one example among many others that prove nuvels technologies have increased displacements instead of reducing them (see sustainable computing on wikipedia)
Good day to all
